Economist: RFS2 waiver costs could outweigh benefits

Policy tremors generated by suspension of federal ethanol mandates could significantly outweigh any short-term benefits of a Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) waiver, University of Illinois ag economist Madhu Khanna warns.

Martin Ross

Published: Oct 9, 2012

This week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ends public comments on a proposal requested by several governors and major livestock groups to reduce or eliminate 2013 RFS2 corn ethanol use requirements.

Unless post-harvest corn prices move “significantly higher,” a waiver likely would have little impact in reducing corn demand for ethanol, said Khanna, policy analyst with the U of I’s Energy Biosciences Institute. A key driver in ethanol use is the need to boost fuel octane (oxygen) levels, and ethanol remains the low-cost octane-boosting option, she noted.

Khanna thus questioned whether EPA should pare back RFS2 goals “if we want to seriously move toward energy security and greenhouse gas mitigation.” She cited the mandate’s role in reducing ethanol production costs and argued “the assurance of demand” is crucial to developing “advanced biofuels” that tap non-food, non-feed sources.

“We need to be taking a longer-term view on biofuels policy, rather than one that is very short-sighted,” she told FarmWeek. “Waiving the mandate for a year would cause so much policy uncertainty. It could have a detrimental effect in terms of future investments in biofuels.

“There are many plants poised to begin production in 2015 with cellulosic feedstocks. We’ve made a lot of progress moving down that path in the last five years. If there were uncertainty about the (RFS2), those investments could come to a crashing halt.”

Prospective new ethanol feedstocks include corn stover -- a commodity in relatively ample supply even in a drought year, Khanna noted. Crop residues and energy crops offer income diversification in drought years or for farmers with less productive lands, she said.

Last week, Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack questioned whether new USDA crop projections should weigh heavily in EPA’s decision -- “I don’t think the United States is going to run out of corn,” he said.

He cited already reduced ethanol production and noted fuel suppliers can use renewable credits to defer near-term biofuels purchases.

“Given the world situation ... we’re not looking at significant reductions in the price of corn as a result of any action EPA could take,” Vilsack said.

“And there are comments from the petroleum industry that, notwithstanding (RFS2 requirements), it’s still going to be relying on ethanol for octane purposes.”

Permalink: Click here

Comments

Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.

Please provide the answer to the following question:

=

Search this site:

Read More Stories

Senate agrees to crop insurance limits

Senate action would reduce crop insurance premium subsidies for larger farm operations.

Read this story


Farmland prices moderate after incredible run

The drop in crop prices in recent months apparently took some steam out of the farmland market. We have comments from Chicago Fed economist David Oppedahl.

Read this story


Northern Illinois small grains program June 20

The event is co-sponsored by the Illinois Wheat Association and U of I Extension.

Read this story

Farmland prices moderate after incredible run

Cash soybean basis levels fall for third day

Buffett sees global need for stewardship, sustainable policies

Senate agrees to crop insurance limits

Rainy week ahead for Illinois farmers

IAITC adapting to meet new math, science, English standards

Senators reject efforts Tuesday to change Senate farm bill

Southern Illinois wheat crop in generally good shape

Illinois farmers catch up on corn planting

Northern Illinois small grains program June 20

Top 50 Tags